During development I encountered a caveat: Opus 4.5 can’t test or view a terminal output, especially one with unusual functional requirements. But despite being blind, it knew enough about the ratatui terminal framework to implement whatever UI changes I asked. There were a large number of UI bugs that likely were caused by Opus’s inability to create test cases, namely failures to account for scroll offsets resulting in incorrect click locations. As someone who spent 5 years as a black box Software QA Engineer who was unable to review the underlying code, this situation was my specialty. I put my QA skills to work by messing around with miditui, told Opus any errors with occasionally a screenshot, and it was able to fix them easily. I do not believe that these bugs are inherently due to LLM agents being better or worse than humans as humans are most definitely capable of making the same mistakes. Even though I myself am adept at finding the bugs and offering solutions, I don’t believe that I would inherently avoid causing similar bugs were I to code such an interactive app without AI assistance: QA brain is different from software engineering brain.
第十条 国家通过多种方式，支持和促进自然保护区领域的国际交流合作。
。谷歌浏览器下载对此有专业解读
Фото: Majid Asgaripour / Reuters
По версии следствия, ночью 13 февраля мужчина дома, будучи пьян, поссорился с 45-летней знакомой и ударил ее по голове неустановленным предметом. Полученная травма оказалась несовместимой с жизнью. Чтобы скрыть следы преступления, мужчина спустил тело в подвал, где его забетонировал.
// 解释：第一个有效数字不能是0，栈空时存0无意义，直接跳过